<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WaterBlogged.org &#187; NYC Water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waterblogged.org/category/nyc-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waterblogged.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Croton owed to Van Cortlandt Park docs</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-owed-vcto-van-cortlandt-park-docs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-owed-vcto-van-cortlandt-park-docs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Cortlandt Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Feasibility Study for the Pedestrian Bridge Report is below from a link on the CB 8 web page under the Croton Water Treatment Plant, Van Cortlandt Park, Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study
Van Cortlandt Park Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study Part 1
Van Cortlandt Park Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study Part 2

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Feasibility Study for the Pedestrian Bridge Report </strong>is below from a link on the CB 8 web page under the Croton Water Treatment Plant, Van Cortlandt Park, Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study<br />
<a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/bxcb8/downloads/pdf/vcp_pedestrian_bridge_report_part_1.pdf">Van Cortlandt Park Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study Part 1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/bxcb8/downloads/pdf/vcp_pedestrian_bridge_report_part_2.pdf">Van Cortlandt Park Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study Part 2</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/VanCortlandtMap-2007-11x17.gif"><img src="http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/VanCortlandtMap-2007-11x17.gif" alt="VanCortlandtMap-2007-11x17" title="VanCortlandtMap-2007-11x17" width="792" height="855" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-571" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-owed-vcto-van-cortlandt-park-docs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chapter 175 of the Laws of 2003 in NYS, MOU &amp; ULURP</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/a8069c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/a8069c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Cortlandt Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the 2003 State Legislation (Chapter 175 of the Laws of 2003, Assembly 8069C and Senate 4791C) that was passed, the city and the state entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which was signed by the Mayor, and the Assembly and Senate Leaders, and approved by the NY City Council in  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of the 2003 State Legislation (Chapter 175 of the Laws of 2003, Assembly 8069C and Senate 4791C) that was passed, the city and the state entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which was signed by the Mayor, and the Assembly and Senate Leaders, and approved by the NY City Council in  2004. </p>
<p><strong>A 8069 C is the bill </strong> <a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/a8069c/a8069c-2/' rel='attachment wp-att-546'>A8069C</a></p>
<p>A8069C with highlights and shortened  <a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/a8069c/a8069c-with-highlights/' rel='attachment wp-att-549'>A8069C with highlights</a></p>
<p>A8069C votes or the HONOR ROLL  <a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/a8069c/assembly-vote-8069/' rel='attachment wp-att-550'>Assembly Vote 8069</a></p>
<p><strong>2004 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) including Project List</strong> as required by Chapter 175<br />
<a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/MOU-scanned-Sept-2004.pdf'>MOU-scanned-Sept-2004</a></p>
<p><strong>1999 ULURP Resolution and List of Projects</strong><br />
<a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Reso-933-of-1999.pdf'>Reso-933-of-1999</a><br />
<a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Mosholu-Mitigation-Res-993-of-1999.pdf'>Mosholu-Mitigation-Res-993-of-1999</a></p>
<p><strong>Letter sent to City Council with Excel List of Projects</strong><br />
<a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/09.13.04-BronxWaterFiltrationPlant1.doc'>09.13.04-BronxWaterFiltrationPlant</a><br />
<a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Updatedlistfor10m091304.xls'>Updatedlistfor10m091304</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/a8069c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily News:  Juan Gonzalez, 9/23/11:  New Yorkers will pay price for Croton Water Treatment Plant cost overruns</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/daily-news-juan-gonzalez-92311-new-yorkers-will-pay-price-for-croton-water-treatment-plant-cost-overruns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/daily-news-juan-gonzalez-92311-new-yorkers-will-pay-price-for-croton-water-treatment-plant-cost-overruns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of Jerome Park Reservoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Cortlandt Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;
New Yorkers will pay price for Croton Water Treatment Plant cost overruns
The price tag of a new Bronx water treatment plant has skyrocketed to $3.4 billion &#8211; nearly three times what the Bloomberg administration announced when construction began in 2004, the city&#8217;s Independent Budget Office says.
The astounding cost overruns for the Croton Water Treatment Plant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="New Yorkers will pay price for Croton Water Treatment Plant cost overruns Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/09/23/2011-09-23_billions_go_down_the_drain.html#ixzz1bM5kylMf">New Yorkers will pay price for Croton Water Treatment Plant cost overruns</a></p>
<p>The price tag of a new Bronx water treatment plant has skyrocketed to $3.4 billion &#8211; nearly three times what the Bloomberg administration announced when construction began in 2004, the city&#8217;s Independent Budget Office says.</p>
<p>The astounding cost overruns for the Croton Water Treatment Plant mean that every New York City household will end up paying, on average, $44 more in its annual water bill for the next few decades just to pay for the plant.</p>
<p>And although city officials keep coming up with cash for the contractors in charge of this money pit, they have yet to produce all the parks improvements they promised Bronx residents in exchange for erecting the new plant in Van Cortlandt Park.</p>
<p>Mayor Bloomberg promised in a 2004 memorandum of understanding with city and state leaders that the Department of Environmental Protection would earmark $200 million over a five year-period from the Croton project&#8217;s budget to pay for boroughwide park improvements.</p>
<p>Only $150 million of that money has been committed, Parks Department spokeswoman Vickie Karp said yesterday.</p>
<p>The Independent Budget Office said the city doesn&#8217;t plan to spend the rest of the $50 million until 2019.</p>
<p>Somehow, a five-year promise mysteriously morphed into 15 years.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m so outraged at everything DEP and the city have done here,&#8221; said North Bronx neighborhood leader Jane Sokolow. &#8220;They keep trampling over a community that didn&#8217;t want this project to begin with.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;All of the Parks [Department] Croton projects have either been built, are in construction, or are in the process of being designed or bid,&#8221; Karp insisted.</p>
<p>&#8220;The undertaking is a huge success and a huge win for the people of the Bronx.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bronx neighborhood leaders see things differently.</p>
<p>They always said the plant, which the city was required to build by the federal Environmental Protection Agency, could be built more cheaply in Westchester County instead of beneath Van Cortlandt Park. But the DEP&#8217;s experts insisted the Bronx site would only cost $1.2 billion.</p>
<p>So what went wrong?</p>
<p>&#8220;Initially, bidding out the work during a hyper-inflated construction market was the primary reason behind cost increases,&#8221; DEP spokesman Farrell Sklerov said yesterday in an email statement.</p>
<p>In 2009, then-city Controller William Thompson audited the project and found it had jumped to $2.1 billion. The original &#8220;conceptual cost estimate [by the city] was unreliable,&#8221; Thompson concluded.</p>
<p>In other words, the neighborhood people had been right.</p>
<p>Since Thompson&#8217;s audit, the plant has swallowed another billion dollars or so.</p>
<p>&#8220;More recently, design and construction change orders due to the complexity of the facility, and enhancements to the design and architecture of the above ground facilities all played a role in cost increases,&#8221; Sklerov added.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all doublespeak, says Bronx Assemblyman Jeff Dinowitz, a longtime critic of the plant.</p>
<p>&#8220;If this was Bloomberg&#8217;s own company, he would have fired the people who screwed this up,&#8221; Dinowitz said. &#8220;But the mayor has not said a word. &#8230; Someone needs to take responsibility for such huge waste.&#8221;</p>
<p>jgonzalez@nydailynews.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/daily-news-juan-gonzalez-92311-new-yorkers-will-pay-price-for-croton-water-treatment-plant-cost-overruns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Croton Funding MOU from September 2004</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-funding-mou-from-september-2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-funding-mou-from-september-2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Cortlandt Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MOU scanned Sept 2004
This was passed by the City Council on September 28, 2004 &#8211; Communication from the Mayor &#8230;.. transmitting the memorandum of
understanding entered into pursuant to chapter 175 of the laws of 2003 in connection with the Croton water filtration facility and the funding of certain eligible projects in the borough of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-funding-mou-from-september-2004/mou-scanned-sept-2004/' rel='attachment wp-att-531'>MOU scanned Sept 2004</a></p>
<p>This was passed by the City Council on September 28, 2004 &#8211; Communication from the Mayor &#8230;.. transmitting the memorandum of<br />
understanding entered into pursuant to chapter 175 of the laws of 2003 in connection with the Croton water filtration facility and the funding of certain eligible projects in the borough of the Bronx.</p>
<p>MOU also references the one and only ULURP on this project passed in 1999.  </p>
<p>Here we are in October 2011 and the DEP has admitted that of the $200 million in the MOU and the $43 million in the ULURP has been frozen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/croton-funding-mou-from-september-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2011:  Notes from the underground</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome Park Reservoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reservoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Cortlandt Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Croton Mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CWTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discharges to the Sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goulden Avenue Closing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC DEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notes about what&#8217;s in the FSEIS .&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; CWTP Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm
Notes from the WM11 CWTP Monthly Report 79 from April 2011. Here is 14 pages excerpted and I have two full reports form April 2011 and August 2010.

Comments WM11 CWTP Mo Rept 79 April 2011 comments
Monthly Report (excerpted) - WM11 CWTP Monthly Report 79 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notes about <strong>what&#8217;s in the FSEIS .</strong>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; <a rel="attachment wp-att-493" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/cwtp-things-that-make-you-go-hmmmmmmmmmm/">CWTP Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm</a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Notes from the <strong>WM11 CWTP Monthly Report 79</strong> from April 2011.<span> Here is </span>14 pages excerpted and I have two full reports form April 2011 and August 2010.</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Comments <a rel="attachment wp-att-487" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/wm11-cwtp-mo-rept-79-april-2011-comments/">WM11 CWTP Mo Rept 79 April 2011 comments</a></li>
<li>Monthly Report (excerpted) - <a rel="attachment wp-att-488" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/wm11-cwtp-monthly-report-79-april-2011-excpts/">WM11 CWTP Monthly Report 79 April 2011 excpts</a></li>
<li>2004 Council MOU info - <a rel="attachment wp-att-489" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/updatedlistfor10m091304/">Updatedlistfor10m091304</a> from <a rel="attachment wp-att-490" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/09-13-04-bronxwaterfiltrationplant/">09.13.04-BronxWaterFiltrationPlant</a></li>
<li>1999 Resolution:  <a rel="attachment wp-att-491" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/reso-933-of-1999-3/">Reso 933 of 1999</a></li>
<li>1999 List of funded projects:  <a rel="attachment wp-att-492" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/mosholu-mitigation-res-993-of-1999-2/">Mosholu Mitigation Res 993 of 1999</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/june-2011-notes-from-the-underground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gowanus Canal Inquiry Underlines Severity of Pollution</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/gowanus-nytimes-canal-inquiry-underlines-severity-of-pollution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/gowanus-nytimes-canal-inquiry-underlines-severity-of-pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storms and Runoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superfund and Brownfields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.
.&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;the DEP does it again!  Read the story from the NY Times today!  See EPA web page below &#8230;..
A yearlong investigation of the Gowanus Canal in preparation for its cleanup under the federal Superfund program has confirmed the severe extent of its contamination and the threat it poses to public health, particularly for people who eat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>.<strong>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;the DEP does it again!  Read the story from the NY Times today!  See EPA web page below &#8230;..</strong></em></p>
<p>A yearlong investigation of the Gowanus Canal in preparation for its cleanup under the federal <a style="color: #004276; text-decoration: underline;" title="More articles about the Superfund program." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/superfund/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">Superfund</a> program has confirmed the severe extent of its contamination and the threat it poses to public health, particularly for people who eat fish from the canal or have repeated contact with its water or sediment.</p>
<p>FULL STORY  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/science/earth/03gowanus.html?src=un&amp;feedurl=http://json8.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.jsonp" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/science/earth/03gowanus.html?src=un&amp;feedurl=http://json8.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.jsonp</a></p>
<p><em><strong>And here is the full report from the EPA including fact sheets and public meetings.</strong> </em> <a href="http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/gowanus/">http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/gowanus/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/gowanus-nytimes-canal-inquiry-underlines-severity-of-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water, Soil and the Spirit of Place</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiltration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storms and Runoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spirit of Place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunts Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lafayette Avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS 175]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gaia Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this while looking through some old boxes of information I accumulated throughout the years.  Still very on point even though it is about six years ago.
Water, Soil, &#38; The Spirit of Place
index
fixprompt
And for all you who do not have flash (apple people), here it is in pdf form:
LafayGreenCBxRSSB4_12_04
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this while looking through some old boxes of information I accumulated throughout the years.  Still very on point even though it is about six years ago.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-449" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/water-soil-the-spirit-of-place/">Water, Soil, &amp; The Spirit of Place</a></p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-449" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/water-soil-the-spirit-of-place/"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-448" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/index-2/">index</a></p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-447" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/fixprompt-3/">fixprompt</a></p>
<p>And for all you who do not have flash (apple people), here it is in pdf form:</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-458" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/lafaygreencbxrssb4_12_04/">LafayGreenCBxRSSB4_12_04</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/water-soil-and-the-spirit-of-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Decision is good EPA WQ standards roadmap for states</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/missouri-decision-is-good-epa-wq-standards-roadmap-for-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/missouri-decision-is-good-epa-wq-standards-roadmap-for-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storms and Runoff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Missouri Decision is a good EPA roadmap for the State&#8217;s role in  adopting water quality standards. 
MO_WQS_decision_letter102909

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The Missouri Decision is a good EPA roadmap for the State&#8217;s role in  adopting water quality standards. </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-438" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/missouri-decision-is-good-epa-wq-standards-roadmap-for-states/mo_wqs_decision_letter102909/">MO_WQS_decision_letter102909</a><br />
</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/missouri-decision-is-good-epa-wq-standards-roadmap-for-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storm Water Entering the Gowanus Canal</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/storm-water-entering-the-gowanus-canal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/storm-water-entering-the-gowanus-canal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storms and Runoff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really unbelievable!
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/sewage-overflow-in-new-york-believe-it/?src=twt&#38;twt=nytimesscience
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really unbelievable!</p>
<p><a href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/sewage-overflow-in-new-york-believe-it/?src=twt&amp;twt=nytimesscience" target="_blank">http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/sewage-overflow-in-new-york-believe-it/?src=twt&amp;twt=nytimesscience</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/storm-water-entering-the-gowanus-canal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics in the Workplace and the Environment &#8212; NYC Water Supply &amp; Sewage</title>
		<link>http://www.waterblogged.org/ethics-environment-nyc-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waterblogged.org/ethics-environment-nyc-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storms and Runoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superfund and Brownfields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Cortlandt Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterblogged.org/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lecture on Ethics in the Workplace by using the environment, sustainability and other questions looking into the future.

Watershed and Sewershed Maps and things of interest


Water Power Point in PDF  Water
Story of the Croton in PDF The story of the Croton


Reviewed four chapters in William J. Byron, The Power of Principles:  Ethics for the New Corporate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lecture on Ethics in the Workplace by using the environment, sustainability and other questions looking into the future.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Watershed and Sewershed Maps and things of interest</strong></li>
</ul>
<ol>
<li>Water Power Point in PDF  <a rel="attachment wp-att-424" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/ethics-environment-nyc-water/water/">Water</a></li>
<li>Story of the Croton in PDF <a rel="attachment wp-att-425" href="http://www.waterblogged.org/ethics-environment-nyc-water/the-story-of-the-croton/">The story of the Croton</a></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Reviewed four chapters in William J. Byron, <strong>The Power of Principles:  Ethics for the New Corporate Cutlure</strong>, Orbis Books, 2006.  Excellent Book that describes ten classic principles.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Show one hour movie:
<ul>
<li><strong>&#8220;Dirt! the Movie&#8221;  - <a href="http://www.dirtthemovie.org/">http://www.dirtthemovie.org/</a></strong></li>
<li><strong>&#8220;Gasland&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/about-the-film/">http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/about-the-film/</a></strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>YouTube of the Gowanus Canal after a rainstorm <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzWOOqPAEgs&amp;feature=player_embedded">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzWOOqPAEgs&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></strong></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waterblogged.org/ethics-environment-nyc-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

